Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Jahmaree LLOYD, appellant.
DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Lisa Grey, J.), rendered March 20, 2023, convicting him of assault in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review an order of protection issued at the time of sentencing.
ORDERED that upon the appeal from the judgment, the order of protection is modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by deleting the provision thereof directing that it shall remain in effect until and including March 19, 2029, and substituting therefor a provision directing that it shall remain in effect until and including March 20, 2028; and it is further,
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
The issue of the duration of the order of protection issued upon the defendant's conviction is properly before this Court on appeal from the judgment (see People v. Alleyne, 207 A.D.3d 554, 554–555, 169 N.Y.S.3d 813). However, the defendant's contention that the order of protection exceeded the permissible statutory maximum duration because it failed to credit him with time served is unpreserved for appellate review because the defendant did not challenge the duration of the order of protection at sentencing or move to amend the order of protection anytime thereafter (see People v. Graves, 201 A.D.3d 736, 737, 156 N.Y.S.3d 888). Nevertheless, we reach this issue in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction (see CPL 470.15[6][a]; People v. Ramos, 164 A.D.3d 922, 923, 82 N.Y.S.3d 103).
As the People correctly concede, the duration of the order of protection exceeded the maximum period permissible under CPL 530.13(4)(B)(ii). The defendant requests, and the People concede, that the order of protection should be modified accordingly. Therefore, we modify the order of protection by providing that it shall remain in effect until and including March 20, 2028 (see People v. Isaacs, 177 A.D.3d 770, 770, 110 N.Y.S.3d 326; People v. Kalb, 91 A.D.3d 1359, 1360, 938 N.Y.S.2d 705).
CHAMBERS, J.P., FORD, TAYLOR and MCCORMACK, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2023-04064
Decided: February 19, 2025
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)