Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Jarae C. CORNWELL, Appellant.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Broome County (Kevin Dooley, J.), rendered November 19, 2021, convicting defendant upon her plea of guilty of the crime of attempted criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree.
Defendant waived indictment and agreed to be prosecuted by a superior court information charging her with criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree. In satisfaction thereof, defendant pleaded guilty to attempted criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree and waived her right to appeal, with the understanding that she would be placed on interim probation pending sentencing. Pursuant to the plea agreement, upon successful completion of the interim probation, defendant would be sentenced to a period of probation. Defendant was advised that, if she did not successfully complete the period of interim probation, she faced a sentence, as a second felony offender, of up to eight years in prison and three years of postrelease supervision. After violating a condition of her interim probation prior to sentencing, County Court sentenced defendant, as a second felony offender, to three years in prison, to be followed by three years of postrelease supervision. Defendant appeals.
We affirm. Given defendant's unchallenged appeal waiver, and as defendant was informed of the maximum sentence that could have been imposed if she failed to complete interim probation, her sole contention on appeal – that her sentence is harsh or excessive – is precluded (see People v. Wiggins, 207 A.D.3d 947, 948, 170 N.Y.S.3d 514 [3d Dept. 2022]; People v. Savage, 158 A.D.3d 854, 855–856, 70 N.Y.S.3d 602 [3d Dept. 2018]).
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
Garry, P.J., Aarons, Reynolds Fitzgerald, McShan and Powers, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 113407
Decided: January 23, 2025
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)