Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Cathrina GUERRE, Plaintiff, v. NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY, Defendant.
Recitation as per CPLR §§ 2219(a) and/or 3212(b) of papers considered on review of this motion:
NYSCEF Doc #s 16-17; 27-30; 37-38 by Def.
NYSCEF Doc #s 2; 31-36 by Plaintiff
NYSCEF Doc # 26
Upon the foregoing cited papers and after oral argument on November 13, 2024, pursuant to CPLR § 3211, the Decision and Order on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's complaint is GRANTED.
On September 29, 2022, pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-e(5), Plaintiff filed an Order to Show Cause (“OSC”) seeking leave to file a late Notice of Claim 1 which Defendant opposed.2 On January 3, 2023, the Court granted Plaintiff's OSC 3 (C. Mallafre-Melendez, J.) and Defendant appealed.4 On April 17, 2024 the Appellate Division Second Department issued an Order reversing the Court's decision and further stated that “in the exercise of discretion, with costs, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed.”5 The Court will not consider arguments regarding Plaintiff's failure to comply with the General Municipal Law. The issues raised herein were previously litigated and are barred by res judicata.6 Pursuant to binding Appellate Division, Second Department authority, it is the law of the case that Plaintiff's OSC is denied and that the entire proceeding is dismissed.7
This constitutes the Decision and Order of the Court.
FOOTNOTES
1. NYSCEF Doc. #s 2 & 13.
2. NYSCEF Doc. #s 16-17.
3. See NYSCEF Doc. # 19.
4. See NYSCEF Doc. # 21.
5. See NYSCEF Doc. # 26.
6. See Schwarz v. Schwarz, 150 AD3d 915 (2d Dept. 2017) (“The doctrine of res judicata operates to preclude the reconsideration of claims actually litigated and resolved in a prior proceeding, as well as claims for different relief against the same party which arise out of the same factual grouping or transaction, and which should have or could have been resolved in the prior proceeding”).
7. See Brownrigg v. New York City Hous. Auth., 29 AD3d 721 (2d Dept. 2006) (“The doctrine of the law of the case seeks to prevent relitigation of issues of law that have already been determined at an earlier stage of the proceeding”).
Patria Frias-Colón, J.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: Index No. 528327 /2022
Decided: January 14, 2025
Court: Supreme Court, Kings County, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)