Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: the Claim of Louis RESTO, Appellant, v. NEW YORK CITY HOUSING AUTHORITY et al., Respondents. Workers' Compensation Board, Respondent.
Appeal from a decision of the Workers' Compensation Board, filed March 13, 2003, which ruled that claimant had voluntarily withdrawn from the labor market.
The factual finding by the Workers' Compensation Board that claimant, formerly employed as a caretaker for the New York City Housing Authority, voluntarily withdrew from the labor market by retiring is supported by substantial evidence (see Matter of Yannucci v. Consolidated Freightways, 6 A.D.3d 945, 946, 775 N.Y.S.2d 193 [2004] ). Although claimant suffered from a 1988 work-related injury to his ankle for which he received benefits, the record supports the Board's finding that his 1994 retirement at the age of 55 with 27 years of service was unrelated to this injury. Specifically, claimant continued to work for five years after his injury (see Matter of Lombardi v. Brooklyn Union Gas Co., 306 A.D.2d 704, 705, 761 N.Y.S.2d 374 [2003] ), never filed for disability-related retirement (see id.; Matter of Milby v. Consolidated Edison, 304 A.D.2d 946, 948, 758 N.Y.S.2d 422 [2003] ) and was never medically advised to retire because of his injury (see Matter of Lombardi v. Brooklyn Union Gas Co., supra; Matter of Pikcilingis v. Macy's, 209 A.D.2d 742, 743, 618 N.Y.S.2d 591 [1994] ). Additionally, there is little evidence suggesting that the injury worsened over time to the extent that it caused him to retire (see Matter of Coneys v. New York City Dept. of Mental Health, 299 A.D.2d 602, 603, 750 N.Y.S.2d 180 [2002] ). Thus, despite some evidence suggesting that claimant's injury may have contributed to his decision to retire, the Board's contrary factual determination must nevertheless be upheld (see Matter of Yannucci v. Consolidated Freightways, supra; Matter of Coneys v. New York City Dept. of Mental Health, supra ).
ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
CARPINELLO, J.
PETERS, J.P., MUGGLIN and LAHTINEN, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: January 06, 2005
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)