Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Robert JOHNSON, Petitioner, v. Donald SELSKY, as Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs, Respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.
Petitioner was charged with violating the prison disciplinary rule prohibiting inmates from using controlled substances after a sample of his urine twice tested positive for the presence of cannabinoids. He was found guilty of this charge following a tier III disciplinary hearing and the determination was upheld on administrative appeal. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.
Initially, petitioner challenges the evidence upon which the determination is based, specifically attacking the chain of custody of the specimen that yielded the positive test results. Based upon our review of the record, however, we find that appropriate testing procedures were followed and the chain of custody was properly established so as to ensure the reliability of the positive test results (see Matter of Davis v. Goord, 8 A.D.3d 854, 855, 778 N.Y.S.2d 566 [2004]; Matter of Dunn v. Selsky, 7 A.D.3d 938, 938-939, 776 N.Y.S.2d 526 [2004] ). Those results, together with the misbehavior report and the testimony of the correction officer who authored it, provide substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt (see Matter of Odome v. Goord, 8 A.D.3d 921, 922, 779 N.Y.S.2d 603 [2004]; Matter of Williams v. New York State Dept. of Corrections, 8 A.D.3d 920, 921, 779 N.Y.S.2d 621 [2004] ). Furthermore, we do not find that the Hearing Officer was biased or that the determination flowed from any alleged bias (see Matter of McCorkle v. Bennett, 8 A.D.3d 918, 919, 779 N.Y.S.2d 623 [2004] ).
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: January 06, 2005
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)