The People, etc., respondent, v. Edwin Urena, appellant. (2024)

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

The People, etc., respondent, v. Edwin Urena, appellant.

2023–02909 (Ind.No. 1028 /21), (Ind. 1028 /21)

Decided: December 24, 2024

FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, J.P. LINDA CHRISTOPHER LILLIAN WAN DONNA–MARIE E. GOLIA, JJ.

Patricia Pazner, New York, N.Y. (Brian Perbix of counsel), for appellant. Melinda Katz, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (Johnnette Traill and Danielle M. O'Boyle of counsel; Lorrie A. Zinno on the memorandum), for respondent.

Submitted—December 4, 2024

DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Toni M. Cimino, J.), imposed March 16, 2023, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80).

CONNOLLY, J.P., CHRISTOPHER, WAN and GOLIA, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Darrell M. Joseph

Clerk of the Court

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network