Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Jaime OLIVIERIS, Appellant.
Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Sullivan County (Ledina, J.), rendered May 31, 2005, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal mischief in the third degree.
After waiving indictment and agreeing to be prosecuted by a superior court information, defendant pleaded guilty to criminal mischief in the third degree and waived his right to appeal. He was thereafter sentenced in accordance with the negotiated plea agreement as a second felony offender to a prison term of 1 1/212 to 3 years. Defendant appeals.
We affirm. Defendant's challenge to the voluntariness of his guilty plea and waiver of the right to appeal is unpreserved for review given his failure to move to withdraw the plea or vacate the judgment of conviction (see People v. Hernandez, 21 A.D.3d 1214, 1215, 801 N.Y.S.2d 167 [2005], lv. denied 5 N.Y.3d 883, 808 N.Y.S.2d 585, 842 N.E.2d 483 [2005]; People v. Daniels, 16 A.D.3d 780, 780, 790 N.Y.S.2d 759 [2005] ). In any event, defendant's claim is without merit. Although defendant informed County Court that he could not read English, he advised that he understood the language, was fully apprised of his rights and the ramifications of pleading guilty and waiving his right to appeal and affirmatively communicated his comprehension, relinquished his rights and freely admitted his guilt. We are therefore satisfied that defendant voluntarily, knowingly and intelligently pleaded guilty and waived his right to appeal (see People v. Hernandez, supra at 1215, 801 N.Y.S.2d 167).
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
MUGGLIN, J.
CREW III, J.P., SPAIN, CARPINELLO and KANE, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: May 24, 2007
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)