Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Vernon A. JONES, Appellant.
Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Rensselaer County (McGrath, J.), rendered January 25, 2006, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of attempted rape in the first degree.
In satisfaction of a five-count indictment, defendant pleaded guilty to attempted rape in the first degree and waived his right to appeal. County Court thereafter sentenced him as a second violent felony offender to 13 years in prison and five years of postrelease supervision. Defendant now appeals.
Defendant contends that his sentence is illegal because County Court failed to comply with the statutory provisions governing the sentencing of second violent felony offenders.1 Specifically, he asserts that he was not advised of his right to controvert his prior conviction or asked if he wished to do so. The record, however, discloses that he was provided with a copy of the statement setting forth his prior felony and admitted to it during sentencing. Thus, we are satisfied that there was substantial compliance with the applicable statutory requirements (see People v. Ochs, 16 A.D.3d 971, 972, 792 N.Y.S.2d 248 [2005] ). Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
FOOTNOTES
1. While the People concede that the second violent felony offender statement was incorrectly filed pursuant to CPL 400.21 instead of CPL 400.15, we conclude that such defect was harmless given that the two statutes contain virtually identical procedural requirements (see People v. Collier, 35 A.D.3d 1037, 1038 n., 827 N.Y.S.2d 319 [2006], lv. denied 9 N.Y.3d 841, 840 N.Y.S.2d 768, 872 N.E.2d 881 [2007] ).
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: January 24, 2008
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)