PEOPLE EX REL ASHTON v. DANNHAUSER (2024)

DECISION, ORDER & JUDGMENT

Writ of habeas corpus in the nature of an application to release S.C. upon his own recognizance or, in the alternative, to set reasonable bail upon Richmond County Indictment No. 70627/2024.  Application by the petitioner to seal the papers filed in connection with the application for a writ of habeas corpus.

ORDERED that the application to seal the papers filed in connection with the application for a writ of habeas corpus is granted to the extent that the papers filed in connection with the application for a writ of habeas corpus are marked confidential and may not be viewed by the public but may be viewed by the parties and counsel appearing on their behalf, and the application to seal is otherwise denied;  and it is further,

ADJUDGED that the writ is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The determination of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, did not violate “constitutional or statutory standards” (People ex rel. Klein v. Krueger, 25 N.Y.2d 497, 499, 307 N.Y.S.2d 207, 255 N.E.2d 552;  see People ex rel. Rosenthal v. Wolfson, 48 N.Y.2d 230, 422 N.Y.S.2d 55, 397 N.E.2d 745).

DUFFY, CHRISTOPHER, GENOVESI and LANDICINO, JJ., concur.