Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Obed HERNANDEZ, Appellant, v. George ALEXANDER, as Chair of the New York State Division of Parole, Respondent.
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Feldstein, J.), entered June 19, 2008 in St. Lawrence County, which dismissed petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the Board of Parole, among other things, denying petitioner's request for parole release.
In 2005, petitioner was convicted of one count of attempted criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree and was sentenced to a prison term of 3 to 6 years. In March 2006, the Board of Parole granted him early conditional parole release for deportation only (see Executive Law § 259-i[2][d] ). The Board subsequently learned that petitioner faced federal prosecution for having illegally reentered the United States (see 8 USC § 1326[b] ), and he ultimately pleaded guilty to one count of that offense and was sentenced to a prison term of 57 months that ran concurrently with his state prison term. At a merit parole hearing in November 2006, the Board allegedly notified petitioner that his early conditional parole had been rescinded and proceeded to deny his request for merit parole. Following an administrative appeal, he commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding. Supreme Court dismissed the application, prompting this appeal.
We affirm. Petitioner's arguments deal with the Board's alleged rescission of his early conditional parole, but he did not raise these issues on his administrative appeal. As such, they are unpreserved for our review (see Matter of Cruz v. Travis, 273 A.D.2d 648, 649, 711 N.Y.S.2d 360 [2000]; Matter of Moore v. New York State Bd. of Parole, 233 A.D.2d 653, 649 N.Y.S.2d 830 [1996] ).
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.
McCARTHY, J.
CARDONA, P.J., ROSE, KANE and GARRY, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: July 02, 2009
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)