Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. David PIERSALL, appellant.
DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from an amended sentence of the County Court, Dutchess County (Jessica Segal, J.), imposed May 18, 2023, on the ground that the amended sentence was excessive.
ORDERED that the amended sentence is affirmed.
The amended sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80).
DUFFY, J.P., MALTESE, DOWLING and VOUTSINAS, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2023–06240
Decided: July 03, 2024
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)