Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. David PIERSALL, appellant.
DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from an amended sentence of the County Court, Dutchess County (Jessica Segal, J.), imposed May 18, 2023, on the ground that the amended sentence was excessive.
ORDERED that the amended sentence is affirmed.
The amended sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80).
DUFFY, J.P., MALTESE, DOWLING and VOUTSINAS, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 2023–06240
Decided: July 03, 2024
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)