Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Paul J. MATHOUS, Appellant.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of St. Lawrence County (John F. Richey, J.), rendered August 4, 2021, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of rape in the third degree.
Defendant entered a guilty plea to the first count of a superior court information charging him with rape in the third degree and agreed to waive his right to appeal. In accordance with the terms of the plea agreement, County Court sentenced defendant, as a second felony offender, to a prison term of four years followed by 15 years of postrelease supervision. Defendant appeals.
We are unpersuaded that defendant's waiver of his right to appeal is invalid. In addition to County Court informing defendant that the waiver of the right to appeal is separate and distinct from the rights forfeited by the guilty plea, the court also explained that certain appellate rights could not be waived, expressly identifying various retained appellate rights – all which defendant acknowledged he understood. Further, defendant executed a written appeal waiver in open court after assuring the court that he had read, understood and reviewed it with counsel and had no questions. In view of the foregoing, the record reflects that defendant knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently waived his right to appeal (see People v. Dobbs, 217 A.D.3d 1276, 1277, 192 N.Y.S.3d 308 [3d Dept. 2023]; People v. Rayder, 214 A.D.3d 1124, 1124, 183 N.Y.S.3d 773 [3d Dept. 2023]; People v. Foote, 210 A.D.3d 1311, 1312, 178 N.Y.S.3d 634 [3d Dept. 2022]). Given the validity of defendant's appeal waiver, his challenge to the sentence as harsh or severe is foreclosed (see People v. Pacherille, 25 N.Y.3d 1021, 1024, 10 N.Y.S.3d 178, 32 N.E.3d 393 [2015]; People v. Dobbs, 217 A.D.3d at 1277, 192 N.Y.S.3d 308; People v. Rayder, 214 A.D.3d at 1124, 183 N.Y.S.3d 773).
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
Clark, J.P., Pritzker, Reynolds Fitzgerald, Fisher and Powers, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 113009
Decided: June 20, 2024
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)