Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: CHENANGO COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, ON BEHALF OF Glenda M. WAYMAN, Respondent, v. Kelly L. FERGUSON, Appellant.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Chenango County (Frank B. Revoir Jr., J.), entered July 27, 2023, which, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Ct Act article 4, revoked a suspended sentence and committed respondent to jail for 30 days.
On May 2, 2023, a Support Magistrate (Natoli, S.M.) found, among other things, that respondent willfully failed to obey an order of child support and directed that money judgments be entered for child support arrears. The Support Magistrate further recommended that respondent be incarcerated in the event the arrears were not paid by a specified time and referred the matter to Family Court for confirmation. At the scheduled confirmation hearing, at which respondent failed to appear but her counsel was present, Family Court, by order dated June 20, 2023, confirmed the willfulness determination and imposed a 30–day suspended sentence upon the condition that respondent pay the calculated arrears by July 21, 2023. Thereafter, Family Court, by order entered July 27, 2023, revoked the suspension of respondent's incarceration and issued an arrest warrant for her to serve 30 days in jail. Respondent appeals from the July 27, 2023 order.
The challenges raised on appeal relate to the finding of willfulness in the Support Magistrate's May 2, 2023 order and Family Court's June 20, 2023 confirmation order, from which no appeals were taken.1 As such, the allegations of errors and improprieties stemming from these orders are not properly before this Court, despite respondent's contention to the contrary (see Matter of Clark v. Clark, 61 A.D.3d 1274, 1275, 876 N.Y.S.2d 913 [3d Dept. 2009], lv denied 13 N.Y.3d 702, 2009 WL 2762643 [2009]; Matter of Dauria v. Dauria, 286 A.D.2d 879, 880, 730 N.Y.S.2d 895 [3d Dept. 2001]). As no issues are raised with respect to the July 27, 2023 order, we affirm.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs.
FOOTNOTES
1. In her appellate reply brief, respondent withdrew any argument with respect to a proposed order to show cause seeking to vacate the July 27, 2023 order, which Family Court declined to sign.
Lynch, J.
Pritzker, J.P., Ceresia, Fisher and Mackey, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: CV-23-1634
Decided: June 20, 2024
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)