Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Desheila Renee THOMAS-JANDREW, Appellant.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of St. Lawrence County (John F. Richey, J.), rendered July 1, 2020, convicting defendant upon her plea of guilty of the crime of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree.
Defendant pleaded guilty to criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree in satisfaction of a two-count indictment and agreed to waive her right to appeal. Pursuant to the terms of the plea agreement, County Court sentenced defendant, as a second felony offender, to a prison term of four years followed by two years of postrelease supervision to be served consecutive to any unexpired parole time. Defendant appeals.
We are unpersuaded that defendant's waiver of her right to appeal is invalid. County Court advised defendant that the waiver of her right to appeal is separate and distinct from those rights forfeited by her guilty plea and explicitly identified various rights that survive the appeal waiver, which defendant acknowledged she understood. The written appeal waiver thereafter executed by defendant in open court, which she acknowledged she had read, reviewed with counsel and understood, also set forth that the waiver of the right to appeal is separate and distinct and that various rights survive. We are satisfied that the record reflects that defendant knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently waived her right to appeal (see People v. Dobbs, 217 AD3d 1276, 1277 [3d Dept 2023]; People v. Rayder, 214 AD3d 1124, 1124 [3d Dept 2023]; People v. Foote, 210 AD3d 1311, 1312 [3d Dept 2022]). As such, defendant's challenge to the severity of the sentence imposed is foreclosed by the valid appeal waiver (see People v. Brown, 37 NY3d 940, 941–942 [2021]; People v. Pacherille, 25 NY3d 1021, 1024 [2015]; People v. Dobbs, 217 AD3d at 1277).
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
Aarons, J.P., Pritzker, Ceresia, Fisher and Mackey, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 112544
Decided: June 13, 2024
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)