Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Rodney PIERRE, Petitioner, v. Anthony J. ANNUCCI, as Acting Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.
MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with possessing a weapon and smuggling. According to the misbehavior report, a correction officer assigned to the yard tower post notified his supervisor of an incident occurring in the gym pavilion area. When other correction officers responded, the tower officer observed petitioner walk away from the pavilion area, reach into his pants pocket and drop an object on the ground. The tower officer alerted the responding officers, and a search of the ground in the area where petitioner was observed dropping the object revealed a ceramic scalpel blade. Petitioner was found guilty of the charges after a tier III disciplinary hearing, but that determination was reversed on administrative appeal and a new tier III disciplinary hearing was ordered. Following that hearing, petitioner was again found guilty of the charges and that determination was affirmed on administrative appeal. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.
Petitioner contends, among other things, that he was improperly denied witnesses at the hearing. Based upon our review of the record, however, we conclude that inaudible gaps in the hearing transcript preclude meaningful review of this issue (see Matter of Hughes v. Annucci, 156 A.D.3d 1032, 1033, 64 N.Y.S.3d 619 [3d Dept. 2017]). Accordingly, the determination must be annulled. While the matter would generally be remitted for a new hearing (see e.g. Matter of Scott v. Annucci, 181 A.D.3d 1032, 1032, 117 N.Y.S.3d 626 [3d Dept. 2020]; Matter of Hughes v. Annucci, 156 A.D.3d at 1033, 64 N.Y.S.3d 619), we note that petitioner has been released on parole supervision. As such, “remittal for a rehearing is not feasible here,” and, therefore, we find that expungement of the determination is the appropriate remedy (Matter of Deboue v. Fischer, 108 A.D.3d 818, 819, 968 N.Y.S.2d 260 [3d Dept. 2013]).
ADJUDGED that the determination is annulled, without costs, petition granted and respondent is directed to expunge all references to this matter from petitioner's institutional record.
Fisher, J.
Garry, P.J., Egan Jr., McShan and Powers, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 535826
Decided: April 25, 2024
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)