Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: AMIR E. (Anonymous), nonparty-appellant. Westchester County Department of Social Services, petitioner-respondent; v. Audrianna W. (Anonymous), respondent-appellant, et al., nonparty.
DECISION & ORDER
In a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384–b, the mother appeals, and the subject child separately appeals, from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County (Michelle I. Schauer, J.), dated December 12, 2022. The order, after a hearing, inter alia, terminated the mother's parental rights and transferred guardianship and custody of the child to the petitioner for the purpose of adoption.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The subject child was born in December 2011. In May 2012, the child was removed from the mother's care. In December 2018, the petitioner commenced this proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384–b to terminate the mother's parental rights to the child on the ground of permanent neglect. The mother consented to a suspended judgment.
In March 2020, the petitioner filed a violation petition, alleging that the mother failed to comply with the terms and conditions of the suspended judgment and seeking to terminate the mother's parental rights. After a hearing, the Family Court, among other things, terminated the mother's parental rights. These appeals ensued.
Contrary to the mother's contention, the evidence adduced at the hearing supported the Family Court's determination that the best interests of the child would be served by terminating the mother's parental rights (see Matter of Joel K.S. [Duane S.], 218 AD3d 589; Matter of Sameeya H.L.W. [Renee L.], 207 AD3d 553; Matter of Ashwantewa P.W.L. [Doris L.], 174 AD3d 714; Matter of Kafayat N.D. [Karlene N.D.], 174 AD3d 600).
The child's contention on appeal is without merit.
The mother's remaining contention is without merit.
CONNOLLY, J.P., MALTESE, FORD and LOVE, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2022–10599
Decided: April 24, 2024
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)