Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Anthony DAVIS, Petitioner, v. Anthony J. ANNUCCI, as Acting Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.
MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner, an incarcerated individual, was charged in a misbehavior report with violating the prison disciplinary rules that prohibit making threats and engaging in conduct involving the threat of violence. According to the misbehavior report, an investigation into petitioner's telephone use revealed that, in November 2022, he expressed anger toward staff at the correctional facility and stated, “I want to come back up and kill these people.” Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of the charges. The determination was upheld upon administrative appeal, and this CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.
We confirm. Contrary to petitioner's contention, the misbehavior report and hearing testimony, as well as the telephone recording submitted for in camera review, provide substantial evidence to support the determination finding petitioner guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules that prohibit making threats and engaging in conduct involving the threat of violence (see Matter of Vicente v. New York State Dept. of Corr. & Community Supervision, 107 AD3d 1203, 1203 [3d Dept 2013]; Matter of Griswold v. Goord, 39 AD3d 908, 909 [3d Dept 2007]; Matter of Walker v. Goord, 266 A.D.2d 778, 778 [3d Dept 1999]). “In addition, petitioner's claim that the threat was not real presented a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve” (Matter of Griswold v. Goord, 39 AD3d at 909 [citations omitted]). To the extent petitioner's remaining contentions are properly before us, they have been considered and found to be without merit.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Garry, P.J., Aarons, Reynolds Fitzgerald, McShan and Powers, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: CV-23-1809
Decided: April 18, 2024
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)