IN RE: Erick GREGOIRE (2024)

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

IN RE: Erick GREGOIRE, appellant, v. Darline BAPTISTE, respondent.

2022–05290

Decided: April 17, 2024

MARK C. DILLON, J.P., LARA J. GENOVESI, LILLIAN WAN, JANICE A. TAYLOR, JJ.

Erick Gregoire, Bayshore, NY, appellant pro se. Liberty Aldrich, Brooklyn, NY (Janet Neustaetter, Rachel J. Stanton, and Beverly Gertler of counsel), attorney for the child.

DECISION & ORDER

In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Lisa J. Friederwitzer, J.), dated June 17, 2022. The order dismissed, without a hearing, the father's petition to enforce the parental access provisions of an order of the same court (Amanda E. White, J.) dated April 20, 2017.

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements.

The subject child has reached the age of 18 and is no longer subject to the custody and parental access provisions of an order dated April 20, 2017 (see Family Ct Act § 119[c]; Matter of Jermaine T. [Jairam T.], 193 A.D.3d 943, 945, 146 N.Y.S.3d 662; Matter of Chana J.A. v. Barry S., 135 A.D.3d 743, 743, 22 N.Y.S.3d 586). Therefore, the appeal from the order must be dismissed as academic.

DILLON, J.P., GENOVESI, WAN and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network