Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Malquan JUNIOUS, Petitioner, v. Anthony J. ANNUCCI, as Acting Commissioner of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent.
MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner was charged in two misbehavior reports with assaulting staff, engaging in violent conduct, making threats, refusing a direct order, possessing contraband, possessing an intoxicant and smuggling. At the conclusion of the tier III disciplinary hearing that followed, petitioner was found not guilty of possessing an intoxicant and guilty of the remaining charges. Petitioner, who had served 18 days of prehearing confinement in the special housing unit, was penalized with an additional 252 days of confinement in said unit and 270 days of loss of recreation, commissary and packages. Petitioner's administrative appeal was unsuccessful, and this CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.
Respondent concedes, and we agree, that the determination must be annulled insofar as it found petitioner guilty of assaulting staff, engaging in violent conduct, making threats, refusing a direct order and possessing contraband. Respondent suggests that the determination of guilt as to the remaining charge of smuggling may be sustained despite the annulment of the determination of guilt as to the contraband and other charges but, given the lack of proof establishing that the material in petitioner's possession was contraband or drugs or that he had taken it from one area of the prison to another under his own volition, the finding as to that charge is also unsupported by substantial evidence in the record (compare Matter of Then v. Annucci, 213 A.D.3d 1183, 1185–1186, 183 N.Y.S.3d 644 [3d Dept. 2023], with Matter of McCaskell v. Rodriguez, 148 A.D.3d 1407, 1408, 48 N.Y.S.3d 642 [3d Dept. 2017]). Thus, the determination is annulled in its entirety.
ADJUDGED that the determination is annulled, without costs, petition granted to that extent, and respondent is directed to expunge all references to these matters from petitioner's institutional record.
Garry, P.J., Egan Jr., Aarons, Reynolds Fitzgerald and McShan, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 535295
Decided: March 28, 2024
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)