Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. James LEE, Appellant.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Chemung County (Christopher P. Baker, J.), rendered August 5, 2019, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree.
In February 2019, defendant was charged in a six-count indictment with three counts of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree and three counts of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree. In satisfaction thereof, defendant pleaded guilty to one count of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree. Pursuant to the terms of the plea agreement, defendant was sentenced to six years in prison, followed by two years of postrelease supervision. Defendant appeals.
We affirm. Defendant's sole challenge on appeal concerns the validity of the indictment. As to his argument that the counts therein are multiplicitous, his claim in this regard was forfeited by his unchallenged guilty plea (see People v. Cole, 118 A.D.3d 1098, 1099–1100, 987 N.Y.S.2d 247 [3d Dept. 2014]; People v. Oakley, 112 A.D.3d 1064, 1064, 976 N.Y.S.2d 619 [3d Dept. 2013], lv denied 22 N.Y.3d 1140, 983 N.Y.S.2d 499, 6 N.E.3d 618 [2014]; People v. Slingerland, 101 A.D.3d 1265, 1266, 955 N.Y.S.2d 690 [3d Dept. 2012], lv denied 20 N.Y.3d 1104, 965 N.Y.S.2d 800, 988 N.E.2d 538 [2013]). In any event, the counts were not multiplicitous as each required proof of an additional fact, or more, that the other did not (see People v. Arnold, 15 A.D.3d 783, 785, 790 N.Y.S.2d 291 [3d Dept. 2005], lv denied 4 N.Y.3d 851, 797 N.Y.S.2d 425, 830 N.E.2d 324 [2005]). Defendant's similar claim that the indictment allegedly failed to comply with the requirements of CPL 200.50(7) is nonjurisdictional in nature and, thus, was likewise waived by his guilty plea (see CPL 200.50[7]; People v. Dubois, 150 A.D.3d 1562, 1564, 55 N.Y.S.3d 513 [3d Dept. 2017]; People v. Cole, 118 A.D.3d at 1099–1100, 987 N.Y.S.2d 247).
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
Egan Jr., J.
Garry, P.J., Clark, Pritzker and Mackey, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 112526
Decided: March 14, 2024
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)