Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, etc., respondent, v. Melissa J. LAGASSE, et al., defendants, Fire Island, Associates, LLC, appellant.
DECISION & ORDER
In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendant Fire Island, Associates, LLC, appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Thomas F. Whelan, J.), dated October 28, 2020. The order, insofar as appealed from, granted those branches of the plaintiff's motion which were for leave to enter a default judgment against that defendant and for an order of reference, and appointed a referee to compute the amount due to the plaintiff.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
On June 23, 2005, the defendant Melissa J. Lagasse executed a note in the amount of $380,000 in favor of WMC Mortgage Corp. (hereinafter WMC). The note was secured by a mortgage on certain real property located in Suffolk County.
On October 19, 2018, the plaintiff, WMC's successor in interest, commenced the instant action to foreclose the mortgage against Lagasse and the defendant Fire Island, Associates, LLC (hereinafter Fire Island), among others. According to an affidavit of service of the plaintiff's process server, Fire Island was served by delivery of the summons and complaint to the Secretary of State on October 23, 2018.
Fire Island moved pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(5) to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against it as time-barred. In an order dated April 4, 2019, the Supreme Court denied the motion and directed Fire Island to file an answer within 10 days of notice of entry of the order. Fire Island concedes that it filed notice of entry of the order on April 8, 2019, and did not file its answer until April 30, 2019—12 days late. The plaintiff served a notice of rejection of the late answer on May 2, 2019.
On or about August 6, 2020, the plaintiff moved, inter alia, for leave to enter a default judgment against Fire Island and for an order of reference. In opposition, Fire Island argued that the motion should be denied because the plaintiff failed to join unidentified tenants of the property as necessary parties to the action. In an order dated October 28, 2020, the Supreme Court, among other things, granted those branches of the plaintiff's motion which were for leave to enter a default judgment against Fire Island and for an order of reference, and appointed a referee to compute the amount due to the plaintiff. Fire Island appeals.
“[W]here the plaintiff has demonstrated, prima facie, that a defendant is in default because he or she ‘failed to appear’ within the meaning of CPLR 3215(a), that defendant is generally precluded from raising any nonjurisdictional defense without first rebutting the prima facie showing of default and obtaining leave to serve a late answer” (Aurora Loan Servs., LLC v. Jemal, 205 A.D.3d 661, 663, 169 N.Y.S.3d 79). Here, the plaintiff demonstrated, and Fire Island concedes, that Fire Island was in default within the meaning of CPLR 3215(a). Furthermore, Fire Island failed to move to vacate its default, and failed to even offer any excuse for that default. Therefore, since Fire Island failed to rebut the prima facie showing of default and obtain leave to serve a late answer, Fire Island's default precludes its nonjurisdictional argument that the plaintiff failed to join necessary parties to the action (see Ditech Fin., LLC v. Howell, 201 A.D.3d 786, 788, 157 N.Y.S.3d 386).
Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted those branches of the plaintiff's motion which were for leave to enter a default judgment against Fire Island and for an order of reference.
CONNOLLY, J.P., MALTESE, WOOTEN and DOWLING, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2020-08869
Decided: February 21, 2024
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)