IN RE: ATTORNEYS IN VIOLATION OF JUDICIARY LAW § 468–A. (2024)

DECISION AND ORDER ON MOTION

Motion by respondent for an order reinstating him to the practice of law following his suspension by October 2023 order of this Court (Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468–a, 220 A.D.3d 1012, 1015, 197 N.Y.S.3d 355 [3d Dept. 2023];  see Rules for Atty Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.16;  Rules of App.Div., 3d Dept [22 NYCRR] § 806.16).¹

Upon reading respondent's notice of motion and affidavit with exhibits filed October 19, 2023, supplemental filings by respondent with exhibits filed November 22, 2023 and January 5, 2024, and the December 29, 2023 responsive correspondence from the Attorney Grievance Committee for the Third Judicial Department, and having determined that respondent has not satisfied his burden of demonstrating his entitlement to reinstatement (see Rules for Atty Disciplinary Matters [22 NYCRR] § 1240.16[a]), it is

ORDERED that respondent's motion for reinstatement is denied.

FOOTNOTES

1.   It is noted that, by order filed January 3, 2024, respondent has also been suspended by the Executive Office for Immigration Review's Board of Immigration Appeals from practicing law before the Board, the Immigration Courts or the Department of Homeland Security based on this Court's suspension of respondent.

Clark, J.P., Pritzker, Lynch, Reynolds Fitzgerald and Powers, JJ., concur.