Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Garfield ALLEN, Petitioner, v. Glenn S. GOORD, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, Respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Chemung County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules prohibiting smuggling and failure to comply with visiting regulations. The misbehavior report was authored by a correction officer who was surveilling the facility's non-contact visiting area when he observed petitioner and his visitor crouched down on either side of the door separating the two sides of the non-contact visiting room. The visit was immediately terminated after which a second correction officer searched petitioner's side of the visiting room where he found a beverage can that contained straw broom bristles tied to lengths of dental floss and a plastic bag. The officer characterized these items as paraphernalia known to be used to transfer contraband under locked doors. The misbehavior report prepared by the correction officer who witnessed the events in question, as well as the other evidence relied on by the Hearing Officer, were sufficient to constitute substantial evidence of petitioner's guilt (see Matter of Alejandro v. Goord, 278 A.D.2d 731, 718 N.Y.S.2d 437 [2000] ). The hearing testimony of petitioner and the telephonic testimony given by his visitor, both of whom attested to petitioner's innocence, presented issues of credibility for resolution by the Hearing Officer (see Matter of Price v. Goord, 301 A.D.2d 986, 987, 754 N.Y.S.2d 453 [2003] ).
Petitioner's additional contentions, including his arguments that his right to a fair hearing was denied by procedural violations, including hearing officer bias, have been examined and found to be without merit (see Matter of Jackson v. Portuondo, 287 A.D.2d 847, 848, 731 N.Y.S.2d 281 [2001] ).
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: January 08, 2004
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)