IN RE: Angelo MATTHEWS (2024)

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

IN RE: Angelo MATTHEWS, petitioner, v. Claudia DANIELS–DEPEYSTER, etc., et al., respondents.

2023–07223

Decided: January 24, 2024

HECTOR D. LASALLE, P.J., JOSEPH J. MALTESE, HELEN VOUTSINAS, LAURENCE L. LOVE, JJ.

Carol Gray and Associates, P.C., Richmond Hill, NY, for petitioner. Letitia James, Attorney General, New York, NY (James B. Cooney of counsel), for respondent Claudia Daniels–DePeyster. Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove and Morgan J. Dennehy of counsel), respondent pro se.

DECISION & JUDGMENT

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, in the nature of prohibition to prohibit the respondents, Claudia Daniels–DePeyster, an Acting Justice of the Supreme Court, Kings County, and Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Kings County, from enforcing an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated July 6, 2023, issued in an action entitled People v. Matthews, pending in that court under Docket No. SCR–74909–22, inter alia, directing the petitioner to submit to a buccal swab for the purpose of DNA testing by a date certain.

ADJUDGED that the petition is denied as academic and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated July 6, 2023, was superseded by an order of the same court dated October 2, 2023. Accordingly, this proceeding is academic.

LASALLE, P.J., MALTESE, VOUTSINAS and LOVE, JJ., concur.

Was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go to Learn About the Law