Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
2 NORTH BROADWAY FOOD, INC., appellant, v. GETTY SQUARE REALTY, LLC, respondent.
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of a commercial lease, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Murphy, J.), dated October 8, 2002, as granted that branch of the defendant's motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the first cause of action alleging breach of the lease.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The defendant landlord demonstrated in its motion for summary judgment that, as a matter of law, the plaintiff tenant defaulted in its performance under the parties' lease. The plaintiff committed numerous violations as cited by the Yonkers Department of Housing and Buildings which led to a court-ordered closure of the premises due to the imminent danger posed to “the occupants [and] any customers entering that retail space.” Contrary to the plaintiff's contentions, the overwhelming majority of violations were the responsibility of the plaintiff. Notwithstanding service by the defendant of a five-day notice to cure said violations, the plaintiff did not cure the violations, and failed to interpose or establish any defense to the defendant's subsequent summary holdover proceeding. Thus, the plaintiff has no viable claim for damages predicated upon the defendant's alleged breaches of the parties' lease (see Fusco v. Kraumlap Realty Corp., 1 A.D.3d 189, 767 N.Y.S.2d 84; Dinolfi v. Berkeley Assocs., Corp., 98 A.D.2d 644, 469 N.Y.S.2d 398). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to demonstrate the existence of a triable issue of fact.
The plaintiff's remaining contentions are without merit.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: February 02, 2004
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)