Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: DONALD M.P. (Anonymous). Administration for Children's Services, respondent; v. Martinique P. (Anonymous), appellant.
DECISION & ORDER
In a proceeding pursuant Family Court Act article 10, the mother appeals from an order of fact-finding of the Family Court, Kings County (Jacqueline B. Deane, J.), dated September 26, 2022, as amended June 22, 2023. The order of fact-finding, as amended, upon the mother's failure to appear at a fact-finding hearing, and after an inquest, found that she derivatively neglected the subject child.
ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, except insofar as it brings up for review the denial of the mother's attorney's application for an adjournment (see CPLR 5511; Matter of Vallencia P. [Valdissa R.], 215 A.D.3d 850, 851, 186 N.Y.S.3d 383); and it is further,
ORDERED that the order of fact-finding, as amended, is affirmed insofar as reviewed, without costs or disbursements.
The order of fact-finding, as amended, was entered upon the mother's failure to appear at a fact-finding hearing (see e.g. Matter of Harlem H.H. [Coty H.], 218 A.D.3d 579, 581, 192 N.Y.S.3d 567; Matter of Bartosz B. [Andrezej B.], 187 A.D.3d 894, 896, 134 N.Y.S.3d 45). Among other reasons, although the mother's attorney appeared at the fact-finding hearing, she elected not to participate and she did not actively represent the mother by presenting evidence or making objections (see Matter of Devon W. [Lavern D.], 127 A.D.3d 1098, 1099, 5 N.Y.S.3d 876), except to the extent that she objected to the Family Court's decision to proceed in the mother's absence. Since the finding of derivative neglect was made upon the mother's default, review is limited to matters that were the subject of contest in the Family Court (see CPLR 5511; Matter of Vallencia P. [Valdissa R.], 215 A.D.3d at 851, 186 N.Y.S.3d 383).
Under the circumstances present here, the mother's contention that the Family Court improvidently exercised its discretion in denying her attorney's application for an adjournment is without merit (Matter of Vallencia P. [Valdissa R.], 215 A.D.3d at 851–852, 186 N.Y.S.3d 383; Matter of Zowa D.P. [Jenia W.], 190 A.D.3d 744, 745, 135 N.Y.S.3d 879).
DILLON, J.P., MILLER, WARHIT and VENTURA, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2022–08732
Decided: January 10, 2024
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)