Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Alvin JOHNSON, Petitioner, v. Donald SELSKY, as Director of Special Housing/Inmate Disciplinary Program, et al., Respondents.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Clinton County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner, a prison inmate, was found guilty of creating a disturbance and refusing a direct order; he was found not guilty of violent conduct and making threats. Contrary to petitioner's contention, the misbehavior report, together with the eyewitness testimony of its author, constitutes substantial evidence to support the determination that petitioner was guilty of the charges he was found to have violated (see, Matter of Garcia v. Goord, 261 A.D.2d 674, 690 N.Y.S.2d 169, appeal dismissed 94 N.Y.2d 834, 703 N.Y.S.2d 66, 724 N.E.2d 761). The detailed misbehavior report establishes that petitioner was asked by the Muslim Chaplain why he had participated in a Muslim service after he had informed relevant officials that he was converting to Protestantism. Petitioner thereafter became agitated and began yelling and refused to leave the Muslim mosque. Under these circumstances, we cannot conclude that there was insufficient evidence to support the determination of guilt.
We have examined petitioner's remaining arguments, including his claim of Hearing Officer bias and denial of his right to call relevant witnesses, and find them to be unpersuasive.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: April 13, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)