Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Philomena McBRIDE, respondent, v. ST. VINCENT'S HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER OF NEW YORK, et al., appellants.
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Patterson, J.), dated September 9, 1999, which denied their motion to change the venue of the action from Kings County to Richmond County.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The defendants' demand for a change of venue, predicated on the ground that the designated county was improper (see, CPLR 510[1] ), was not served with the answer or before the answer was served (see, CPLR 511[a] ), but was made over two years later and was therefore addressed to the court's discretion (see, Horowicz v. RSD Transp., 249 A.D.2d 511, 671 N.Y.S.2d 335; O'Connor v. Roman Catholic Diocese of Rockville Centre, 231 A.D.2d 700, 648 N.Y.S.2d 42; Fitzpatrick v. Sullivan, Magee & Sullivan, 49 A.D.2d 902, 373 N.Y.S.2d 381). The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the motion. The plaintiff established through documentary evidence that at the time this action was commenced, she intended to retain her residence of 30 years in Kings County (see, Mandelbaum v. Mandelbaum, 151 A.D.2d 727, 542 N.Y.S.2d 791; Siegfried v. Siegfried, 92 A.D.2d 916, 460 N.Y.S.2d 131; Katz v. Siroty, 62 A.D.2d 1011, 1012, 403 N.Y.S.2d 770; CPLR 503[a] ). Furthermore, the defendants' delay in moving for a change of venue was not caused by any willful omission or misleading statement by the plaintiff regarding her residence (see, Horowicz v. RSD Transp., supra).
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: April 17, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)