Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. John T. COY, Appellant.
Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Madison County (Di Stefano, J.), rendered April 6, 2005, upon a verdict convicting defendant of the crime of assault in the second degree.
Following a jury trial, defendant was convicted of assault in the second degree as a result of injuries he inflicted on the female victim. His sole contention on appeal is that the victim was not shown to have sustained a “serious physical injury” (Penal Law § 120.05[1] ). That term, as applied here, is defined as a “physical injury which ․ causes ․ protracted impairment of [the victim's] health” (Penal Law § 10.00[10] ).
The medical evidence and testimony of the victim at trial established that, as a result of defendant's attack, she suffered a broken clavicle, bruised ribs and four broken facial bones which required surgical implantation of supporting plates. She also had extensive neck and facial bruises and lacerations requiring stitches, and she lost consciousness. After her initial treatment and examination in the emergency room, the victim was placed in intensive care where she remained for approximately four days after the incident. Photographs presented to the jury during the trial clearly showed the severity of the victim's injuries, and other evidence indicated that the facial numbness, indentations in her head and the need for pain medication had persisted for more than one year and are likely to be permanent conditions. From the evidence, the jury could also reasonably infer that the victim's injuries required her to undergo plastic surgery. Such evidence sufficiently established a protracted impairment of the victim's health (see People v. Kern, 75 N.Y.2d 638, 658, 555 N.Y.S.2d 647, 554 N.E.2d 1235 [1990], cert. denied 498 U.S. 824, 111 S.Ct. 77, 112 L.Ed.2d 50 [1990]; People v. Graham, 297 A.D.2d 579, 580, 747 N.Y.S.2d 171 [2002], lv. denied 99 N.Y.2d 535, 752 N.Y.S.2d 596, 782 N.E.2d 574 [2002]; People v. Lewis, 277 A.D.2d 603, 606-607, 714 N.Y.S.2d 830 [2000], lv. denied 95 N.Y.2d 966, 722 N.Y.S.2d 483, 745 N.E.2d 403 [2000]; People v. Knapp, 213 A.D.2d 740, 741, 623 N.Y.S.2d 355 [1995] ).
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
ROSE, J.
MERCURE, J.P., CREW III, PETERS and SPAIN, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: November 15, 2007
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)