Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Jack VIGLIOTTI, Petitioner, v. James BELL, as Correction Captain, et al., Respondents.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Superintendent of Clinton Correctional Facility which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Following a tier II prison disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of creating a disturbance, refusing a direct order, making threats and engaging in harassing behavior. As a result, a penalty of 30 days in keeplock and a corresponding loss of privileges was imposed. The determination was administratively affirmed and this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking annulment ensued.
We confirm. The misbehavior report, together with the hearing testimony of the correction officer who authored it, provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt (see Matter of Rodriguez v. Selsky, 48 A.D.3d 851, 852, 850 N.Y.S.2d 703 [2008] ). To the extent that petitioner and other inmate witnesses offered contradictory testimony, credibility issues were created for resolution by the Hearing Officer (see Matter of Rosa v. Brown, 47 A.D.3d 1142, 1143, 849 N.Y.S.2d 185 [2008] ). Petitioner's assertion that the Hearing Officer was biased is not substantiated by the record, and there is no indication that the determination flowed from any purported bias (see Matter of Kirby v. Leclaire, 47 A.D.3d 1174, 1175, 850 N.Y.S.2d 300 [2008] ). We have reviewed petitioner's remaining contentions, including his claims that his mental health was not properly considered and the penalty imposed was excessive, and find them to be unavailing.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: June 19, 2008
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)