Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Brian WILLIAMS, appellant, v. Kisha TAYLOR, respondent.
In a child custody proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Grosvenor, J.), dated March 23, 2005, which granted that branch of the mother's motion which was, in effect, to dismiss the petition for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, that branch of the mother's motion which was, in effect, to dismiss the petition for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is denied, the petition is reinstated, the matter is remitted to the Family Court, Kings County, for further proceedings in accordance herewith, and the prior order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated September 27, 2004, awarding custody of the child to the mother, is vacated.
While the mother submitted documents to the Family Court indicating that she may have commenced a custody proceeding in Jamaica, West Indies, before the commencement of the instant proceeding, the Family Court erred in summarily dismissing the instant petition. Rather, the Family Court should have communicated with the courts of Jamaica regarding what, if any, proceedings were pending in Jamaica, and whether Jamaica maintained and wished to retain jurisdiction over the matter (see Domestic Relations Law § 76-e[1], [2]; Matter of Javier v. Javier, 264 A.D.2d 735, 736-737, 694 N.Y.S.2d 737; Cynthia Marie S. v. Allen Wayne L., 228 A.D.2d 249, 250, 643 N.Y.S.2d 569). Upon remittitur, if the Family Court determines that a prior proceeding remained pending in Jamaica, and the Jamaican court wishes to retain jurisdiction, only then should the Family Court dismiss this proceeding in favor of the Jamaican proceeding (see Domestic Relations Law § 76-e[1], [2] ).
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: July 11, 2005
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)