IN RE: Marianne SOTTILE (2023)

DECISION & JUDGMENT

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, in effect, in the nature of prohibition to prohibit the respondent, James J. Hyer, a Justice of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, from acting in excess of his authority, from enforcing an order dated March 28, 2022, issued in an action entitled Castle Peak 2012–1 Loan Trust Mortgage Backed Notes, Series 2012–1 v Sottile, pending in the Supreme Court, Orange County, under Index No. 9857/10, and from presiding over that action and an action entitled Sottile v. Marchai Properties, LP, pending in the Supreme Court, Orange County, under Index No. 655/22.

ADJUDGED that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.

“Because of its extraordinary nature, prohibition is available only where there is a clear legal right, and then only when a court—in cases where judicial authority is challenged—acts or threatens to act either without jurisdiction or in excess of its authorized powers” (Matter of Holtzman v. Goldman, 71 N.Y.2d 564, 569, 528 N.Y.S.2d 21, 523 N.E.2d 297;  see Matter of Rush v. Mordue, 68 N.Y.2d 348, 352, 509 N.Y.S.2d 493, 502 N.E.2d 170).  The petitioner has failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought.

The petitioner's remaining contentions are without merit.

BRATHWAITE NELSON, J.P., MALTESE, FORD and WARHIT, JJ., concur.