Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Raymond EDWARDS, Petitioner, v. Glenn S. GOORD, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, et al., Respondents.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Clinton County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Substantial evidence supports the determination finding petitioner guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules that prohibit possession of a weapon and possession of an altered item after a search of his cell revealed a metal shank hidden in the binding of a book. Petitioner concedes that he was in possession of the book, but denies that he knew that a weapon was secreted in the binding. Petitioner's assertion that he was unaware of the weapon in the book created a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see Matter of Jackson v. Selsky, 288 A.D.2d 802, 733 N.Y.S.2d 527, cert. denied 97 N.Y.2d 612, 742 N.Y.S.2d 604, 769 N.E.2d 351). Furthermore, although petitioner claims that he did not have exclusive access to his cell and that the book recently had been given to him by another inmate, a reasonable inference of possession nevertheless arises from the fact that the weapon was found in an area within his control (see id.; Matter of Tarbell v. Goord, 263 A.D.2d 563, 693 N.Y.S.2d 262).
Next, we reject petitioner's contention that the misbehavior report was not sufficiently detailed to adequately notify petitioner of the charges against him and enable him to prepare a defense. Although the reporter's signature and preparation date appeared only on the Hearing Officer's copy of the misbehavior report, such information appeared in the body of the misbehavior report. Moreover, the reporting officer testified at the hearing. Under these circumstances, we find that petitioner has failed to demonstrate any prejudice (see Matter of Alamin v. New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs., 252 A.D.2d 824, 675 N.Y.S.2d 447). Petitioner's remaining contentions have been reviewed and found to be without merit.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: October 31, 2002
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)