Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Allan J. KASEN, an attorney and counselor-at-law. Grievance Committee for the Second and Eleventh Judicial Districts, Petitioner; Allan J. Kasen, Respondent.
MOTION by the petitioner pursuant to 22 NYCRR 691.3 to impose discipline on the respondent based upon disciplinary action taken against him by the State of Arizona. The respondent was admitted to the Bar in the State of New York on June 17, 1970, at a term of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department.
By judgment and order of the Supreme Court of the State of Arizona, dated September 19, 1996, the respondent was suspended from the practice of law in Arizona for a period of three years, based upon his manipulation of his law firm's records of billable hours to grossly inflate the amount of time he was actually spending on client matters.
On or about October 9, 1996, the respondent was served with a notice pursuant to 22 NYCRR 691.3, informing him of his right to interpose certain enumerated defenses to the imposition of discipline in New York. By letter dated November 22, 1996, the respondent informed the petitioner and this court that he would not be requesting a hearing, nor would he be raising any defense to the imposition of discipline.
Accordingly, the respondent is suspended from the practice of law in New York for one year, effective immediately. The respondent's reinstatement to the New York State Bar is contingent upon his reinstatement to the Arizona State Bar.
ORDERED that the petitioner's motion is granted; and it is further,
ORDERED that pursuant to 22 NYCRR 691.3, the respondent, Allan J. Kasen, is suspended from the practice of law in New York for a period of one year, effective immediately, with reinstatement to the New York State Bar conditioned upon proof that he has been reinstated to the Arizona State Bar; and it is further,
ORDERED that the respondent shall promptly comply with this court's rules governing the conduct of disbarred, suspended, and resigned attorneys (22 NYCRR 691.10); and it is further,
ORDERED that pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90, during the period of suspension and until the further order of this court, the respondent, Allan J. Kasen, is commanded to desist and refrain from (l ) practicing law in any form, either as principal or agent, clerk or employee of another, (2) appearing as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, Judge, Justice, board, commission, or other public authority, (3) giving to another an opinion as to the law or its application or any advice in relation thereto, and (4) holding himself out in any way as an attorney and counselor-at-law.
PER CURIAM.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: February 18, 1997
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)