Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Harriet KAUFMAN, Respondent, v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF JERICHO UNION FREE SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., Appellants.
In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Superintendent of Schools of the Jericho Union Free School District dated April 18, 1995, which found that the petitioner was not eligible for retroactive membership in the New York State Teachers' Retirement System, the Board of Education of Jericho Union Free School District and Superintendent Robert Manheimer appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Brucia, J.), entered January 4, 1996, which granted the petition and vacated the determination.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
We agree with the Supreme Court that the determination finding the petitioner ineligible for retroactive membership in the New York State Teachers' Retirement System was arbitrary and capricious and without a rational basis (see, Matter of Fariel v. Board of Educ. of Valley Stream Union Free School Dist. 13, 230 A.D.2d 854, 646 N.Y.S.2d 545 ). The affidavit belatedly submitted by the appellants with their answer to the petition containing further justification for their decision cannot be considered inasmuch as judicial review of an administrative determination is limited to the grounds invoked by the administrative body (see, Matter of Scherbyn v. Wayne-Finger Lakes Bd. of Coop. Educ. Servs., 77 N.Y.2d 753, 758-759, 570 N.Y.S.2d 474, 573 N.E.2d 562; Matter of Fariel v. Board of Educ. of Valley Stream Union Free School Dist. 13, supra). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the petition.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: February 18, 1997
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)