Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Christine CLASSIE, Respondent, v. STRATTON OAKMONT, INC., et al., Appellants.
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages pursuant to Executive Law § 296 for sexual harassment, the defendants appeal from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Kutner, J.), dated December 29, 1995, which granted the plaintiff's motion for leave to enter a default judgment against them, and (2) an order of the same court dated April 16, 1996, which denied their motion to vacate their default in answering the complaint.
ORDERED that the orders are reversed, as a matter of discretion, with costs to the plaintiff, the plaintiff's motion is denied, the defendants' motion is granted, and the defendants' time to serve their answers is extended until 20 days after service upon them of a copy of this decision and order, with notice of entry, on condition that the defendants personally pay $1,500 to the plaintiff within 20 days after service of a copy of this decision and order, with notice of entry; in the event that condition is not complied with, the orders are affirmed, with costs to the plaintiff.
The parties were engaged in negotiations for several months prior to the commencement of this action in an effort to avoid litigation, and the defendants contend that settlement negotiations continued after the action was commenced. The defendants were approximately two weeks late in serving their answer, which, together with their affidavits, presented sharp factual disputes which could only be resolved after a trial. Under these circumstances, and considering the minimal prejudice to the plaintiff caused by the defendants' short delay in answering, as well as the public policy in favor of resolving cases on the merits, we conclude that it was an improvident exercise of the court's discretion to refuse to vacate the defendants' default (see, Scielzi v. Gold, 213 A.D.2d 872, 624 N.Y.S.2d 66; Walter v. Rockland Armor & Metal Corp., 140 A.D.2d 335, 528 N.Y.S.2d 82; see also, Robles v. Grace Episcopal Church, 192 A.D.2d 515, 595 N.Y.S.2d 824; I.J. Handa, P.C. v. Imperato, 159 A.D.2d 484, 552 N.Y.S.2d 356). Nevertheless, under the circumstances, we deem it appropriate to require the defendants to pay the plaintiff the sum of $1,500 as a condition of reversal.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: February 18, 1997
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)