Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Injah TAFARI, Appellant, v. Donald SELSKY, as Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs, Respondent.
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Ceresia Jr., J.), entered July 16, 2007 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
When instructed by a correction officer to sit in the holding cage, petitioner became disruptive, shouted obscenities and threatened to harm the officer. As a result, he was charged in a misbehavior report with harassment, creating a disturbance and making threats. He was found guilty of the charges following a tier III disciplinary hearing and the determination was upheld on administrative appeal. Petitioner then commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging the determination and, following joinder of issue, Supreme Court dismissed the petition. This appeal ensued.
Petitioner's sole contention on appeal is that he was improperly denied the right to have an unidentified nurse testify as a witness at the disciplinary hearing. Inasmuch as he failed to raise this objection at the hearing, he has not preserved it for our review (see Matter of Davila v. Selsky, 48 A.D.3d 846, 847, 850 N.Y.S.2d 705 [2008]; Matter of Newsome v. Selsky, 26 A.D.3d 565, 566, 807 N.Y.S.2d 725 [2006] ). Accordingly, Supreme Court properly dismissed the petition.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: November 13, 2008
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)