Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Dios GUTIERREZ, plaintiff, v. STEVEN LINCOLN-MERCURY, INC., et al., respondents; Eileen Gutierrez, etc., nonparty-appellant.
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for injury to property, nonparty Eileen Gutierrez appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Balter, J.), dated August 15, 2007, which denied her motion pursuant to CPLR 1015(a) to substitute herself, in her capacity as administratrix of the estate of Dios Gutierrez, in the place and stead of the deceased plaintiff, and to restore the action to the active calendar.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.
This action was marked “disposed of” on November 2, 1990, when neither the plaintiff nor his attorney appeared in court for a scheduled status conference. The plaintiff died more than 14 years later without having restored the action to the active calendar, and his daughter Eileen Gutierrez was appointed administratrix of his estate. In order to vacate the deceased plaintiff's 1990 default in appearing at the status conference, the administratrix was required to demonstrate both a reasonable excuse for the default and the existence of a meritorious cause of action (see 22 NYCRR 202.27; Perez v. New York City Hous. Auth., 47 A.D.3d 505, 850 N.Y.S.2d 75; Brooks v. Haidt, 30 A.D.3d 365, 815 N.Y.S.2d 735). In view of the administratrix's failure to come forward with any reasonable explanation for the inordinate 17-year delay in seeking to restore this action to the active calendar, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying her motion.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: November 12, 2008
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)