Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Claude DAVIS Jr., Appellant, v. The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent.
Appeal from an order of the County Court of St. Lawrence County (Richards, J.), entered October 2, 2007, which denied petitioner's application pursuant to CPL 390.50 for a copy of his presentence report.
Petitioner, a prison inmate, filed an application in County Court pursuant to CPL 390.50 for a copy of the presentence investigation report, prepared in connection with the prior criminal action against him, in order to prepare for an appearance before the Board of Parole. County Court denied his application and petitioner appeals.
We reverse. Pursuant to CPL 390.50(1), disclosure of a presentence report is permitted upon a proper factual showing of need (see Matter of Gutkaiss v. People, 49 A.D.3d 979, 979, 853 N.Y.S.2d 677 [2008]; Matter of Kilgore v. People, 274 A.D.2d 636, 636, 710 N.Y.S.2d 690 [2000] ). Here, as the People acknowledge, petitioner made such a showing, as he demonstrated an impending hearing before the Board and the presentence report is one of the factors that the Board is required to consider upon application for release (see Executive Law § 259-i[1][a]; [2][c]; Matter of Gutkaiss v. People, 49 A.D.3d at 979, 853 N.Y.S.2d 677; Matter of Shader v. People, 233 A.D.2d 717, 717, 650 N.Y.S.2d 350 [1996] ).
ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, without costs, and matter remitted to the County Court of St. Lawrence County for further proceedings not inconsistent with this Court's decision.
ROSE, J.
MERCURE, J.P., LAHTINEN, KAVANAGH and STEIN, JJ., concur.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: June 12, 2008
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)