Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Hasan RAQIYB, Appellant, v. Glenn S. GOORD, as Commissioner of the Department of Correctional Services, et al., Respondents.
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Feldstein, J.), entered May 22, 1997 in Clinton County, which dismissed petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.
Supreme Court dismissed the application of petitioner, a prison inmate, seeking CPLR article 78 review of the determination by respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found him guilty of verbally harassing a correction officer in violation of the prison disciplinary rule prohibiting such conduct. We affirm. The record does not support petitioner's contention that he was misled by the Hearing Officer into withdrawing his request for certain witnesses. Petitioner sought two witnesses to corroborate his testimony in defense of charges that he had refused to obey a direct order and failed to produce an identification card. He withdrew his request for these witnesses after the Hearing Officer indicated that he believed petitioner's exculpatory testimony with respect to these charges. Since petitioner was found not guilty of these charges, we fail to see how he was misled and, in any event, do not find that he could have been prejudiced in any way. Moreover, we reject petitioner's claim of Hearing Officer bias, finding no support in the record for his claim or that the outcome of the hearing flowed from the alleged bias (see, Matter of Nieves v. Coughlin, 157 A.D.2d 943, 550 N.Y.S.2d 203). Petitioner's remaining contentions have been considered and found to be without merit.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: January 08, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)