Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Arlene RAKOWSKI, Petitioner, v. H. Carl McCALL, as Administrative Head of the New York State and Local Employees Retirement System and as Comptroller of the State of New York, et al., Respondents.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Comptroller which denied petitioner's application for ordinary disability retirement benefits.
Petitioner's application for ordinary disability retirement benefits was denied by respondent Comptroller on the ground that she had failed to prove that she was permanently incapacitated from performing her duties as a labor service representative for the Department of Labor. Petitioner thereafter commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging the administrative determination.
Although petitioner's medical experts concluded that petitioner suffered from multiple chemical sensitivity triggered by unknown substances in her work place and that, based on her subjective complaints of, inter alia, dizziness, light-headedness, fatigue, headaches and loss of concentration, her condition was disabling, the medical expert who examined petitioner on behalf of respondent State and Local Employees Retirement System reached a contrary conclusion. Notwithstanding petitioner's subjective complaints, this expert testified that the physical examination he performed disclosed no clinical evidence of a condition which would prevent petitioner from performing her job duties. Because the exclusive authority to evaluate and resolve conflicts in medical testimony is vested in the Comptroller, we find that his determination finding that petitioner failed to sustain her burden of proof in this regard is supported by substantial evidence and must be confirmed (see, Matter of Lopez v. McCall, 236 A.D.2d 690, 691-692, 652 N.Y.S.2d 906; Matter of Sollas v. McCall, 211 A.D.2d 942, 621 N.Y.S.2d 944).
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: January 08, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)