Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Samuel EDMONSON, Petitioner, v. Philip COOMBE, as Commissioner of the Department of Correctional Services, Respondent.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner, a State prison inmate, was found guilty of violating prison disciplinary rules which prohibit assaulting an inmate and possessing a weapon. The charges stem from petitioner's alleged assault on a fellow inmate with a razor blade. Following an unsuccessful administrative appeal, petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging the determination.
We confirm. Contrary to petitioner's contention, we find that the hearing was commenced within seven days of his confinement on September 10, 1996 as required by 7 NYCRR 251-5.1(a). The hearing was commenced on September 15, 1996 when the misbehavior report was read into the record and petitioner entered his plea of not guilty to the charges (see, Matter of Bernacet v. Coughlin, 145 A.D.2d 802, 803, 535 N.Y.S.2d 785, lv. denied 74 N.Y.2d 603, 542 N.Y.S.2d 518, 540 N.E.2d 713). Although the hearing was subsequently adjourned, we find that the seven-day requirement was satisfied (see, id.).
Furthermore, the detailed misbehavior report authored by a correction officer who witnessed the attack, together with the testimony of the correction officer who escorted the victim to the hospital, provide substantial evidence to support the determination of petitioner's guilt (see, Matter of Foster v. Coughlin, 76 N.Y.2d 964, 966, 563 N.Y.S.2d 728, 565 N.E.2d 477; Matter of Gibson v. Selsky, 244 A.D.2d 739, 664 N.Y.S.2d 391). Petitioner's remaining contentions, including his claims of Hearing Officer bias and ineffective employee assistance, are either unpreserved for our review or have been found to be unpersuasive.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: January 08, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)