Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Shawn COAN, Appellant, v. LONG ISLAND RAIL ROAD, et al., Respondents.
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Lama, J.), dated December 27, 1996, which denied his motion to compel the defendants to produce reports and claims of prior accidents.
ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the plaintiff's motion is granted.
The plaintiff commenced the instant action to recover damages for injuries he sustained when he fell from a Long Island Rail Road diesel train. The train allegedly accelerated suddenly as he was getting off of it. The plaintiff asserted that the defendants were negligent, inter alia, in allowing the train “to jerk, move and accelerate while the door and/or doors of said train were open”. At issue is whether the plaintiff is entitled to accident reports of prior similar occurrences on diesel trains for a specified period.
CPLR 3101(a) requires “full disclosure of all matter material and necessary in the prosecution or defense of an action”. This includes written accident reports prepared in the regular course of business (see, CPLR 3101 [g] ). Records of prior similar accidents are admissible and discoverable in a negligence action since they are relevant in establishing that a particular condition was dangerous and that the defendant had notice of that condition (see, Klatz v. Armor Elevator Co., 93 A.D.2d 633, 637-638, 462 N.Y.S.2d 677; Lestingi v. City of New York, 209 A.D.2d 384, 385, 618 N.Y.S.2d 731; Taylor v. Doe, 167 A.D.2d 984, 562 N.Y.S.2d 6). The reports requested by the plaintiff in the instant case are material and relevant to establish that leaving the train doors open while pulling out of a train station constituted a dangerous condition and the defendants' notice thereof. Therefore, they are discoverable (see, Lestingi v. City of New York, supra; Kaplan v. Einy, 209 A.D.2d 248, 251, 618 N.Y.S.2d 777; cf., Yoon v. F.W. Woolworth Co., 202 A.D.2d 575, 576-577, 609 N.Y.S.2d 260).
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: January 20, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)