Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Sammy SAMPSON, appellant.
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (LaPera, J.), rendered May 26, 2005, convicting him of assault in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
The trial court providently exercised its discretion in denying the defendant's request at sentencing to vacate his plea or, alternatively, for an adjournment to prepare a motion to vacate his plea (see People v. White, 213 A.D.2d 507, 623 N.Y.S.2d 618). Although given the opportunity to do so, the defendant did not present the trial court with any grounds at sentencing for withdrawing the plea or granting the adjournment.
The defendant's present challenges to the sufficiency of his plea are unpreserved for appellate review. In any event, the contentions are without merit. The trial court properly allocuted the defendant as to the elements of assault in the second degree (see Penal Law § 120.05[1] ) and was not required to engage in a particular litany during the allocution to obtain a valid plea (see People v. Milgrom, 281 A.D.2d 492, 493, 721 N.Y.S.2d 777; People v. Toye, 264 A.D.2d 401, 695 N.Y.S.2d 106).
The defendant's challenge to the predicate violent felony statement is unpreserved for appellate review (see e.g. People v. Smith, 238 A.D.2d 451, 656 N.Y.S.2d 348; People v. Jackson, 151 A.D.2d 781, 543 N.Y.S.2d 110). In any event, the challenge is without merit. Where, as here, “the statutory purposes for filing a predicate statement (i.e. apprising the court of the prior conviction and affording defendant notice and an opportunity to be heard in connection with the predicate felony) are satisfied, strict compliance with [Criminal Procedure Law § 400.15] is not required” (People v. Carmello, 114 A.D.2d 965, 495 N.Y.S.2d 230). The record demonstrates that the defendant was aware that the court was considering his previous conviction of manslaughter in the first degree, and knew that he was being sentenced as a prior violent felony offender (see People v. Jackson, supra).
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: June 20, 2006
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)