PEOPLE v. EARL (1998)

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

The PEOPLE, etc., Respondent, v. Douglas EARL, Appellant.

Decided: November 09, 1998

Before RITTER, J.P., and THOMPSON, SANTUCCI and JOY, JJ.

Larry Sheehan, Scarsdale, N.Y., for appellant. Jeanine Pirro, District Attorney, White Plains, N.Y. (Gregory Babikian and Maryanne Luciano of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Cowhey, J.), rendered May 12, 1997, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The voir dire minutes do not support the defendant's assertion that two venirepersons indicated actual bias, or that they would otherwise be unable to render an impartial verdict (see, CPL 270.20[1][b] ). Thus, the court did not err in denying the defendant's challenge of each for cause (see, People v. Torpey, 63 N.Y.2d 361, 482 N.Y.S.2d 448, 472 N.E.2d 298; People v. Archer, 210 A.D.2d 241, 619 N.Y.S.2d 738).

The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.

MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network