Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Thomas MAHER, petitioner, v. Christopher J. CADE, et al., respondents.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Board of Fire Commissioners of the Town of Eastchester, dated January 9, 2003, which adopted the recommendation of a Hearing Officer dated November 4, 2002, made after a hearing, finding the petitioner guilty of six specifications of misconduct and insubordination, and terminating his employment as a firefighter.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.
The review of administrative determinations in employee disciplinary cases made after a hearing required by Civil Service Law § 75 is limited to a consideration of whether the determination was supported by substantial evidence (see 300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc. v. State Div. of Human Rights, 45 N.Y.2d 176, 408 N.Y.S.2d 54, 379 N.E.2d 1183; Matter of Jones v. Mahon, 11 A.D.3d 692, 783 N.Y.S.2d 295; Matter of Mann v. Town of Monroe, 2 A.D.3d 527, 767 N.Y.S.2d 924). Contrary to the petitioner's contention, the determination that he committed six acts of misconduct and insubordination, which included disobeying his supervisor's directive against engaging in work related to his private limousine business while on duty, was supported by substantial evidence (see Matter of Mann v. Town of Monroe, supra; Matter of Beisgen [Town of Orangetown], 272 A.D.2d 322, 714 N.Y.S.2d 677; Matter of Parker v. Blauvelt Volunteer Fire Co., 222 A.D.2d 437, 634 N.Y.S.2d 524). The Hearing Officer weighed the conflicting testimony presented at the hearing and assessed the credibility of the witnesses, and this record provides no basis to disturb the Hearing Officer's resolution of these issues in favor of the respondents (see Matter of Berenhaus v. Ward, 70 N.Y.2d 436, 522 N.Y.S.2d 478, 517 N.E.2d 193; Matter of Natividad v. Glen Cove Hous. Auth., 308 A.D.2d 542, 764 N.Y.S.2d 848; Matter of Scharf v. Levittown Union Free School Dist., 294 A.D.2d 508, 742 N.Y.S.2d 848).
Furthermore, in light of the evidence of the petitioner's repeated misconduct and insubordination, the penalty of dismissal was not so disproportionate to the offenses as to be shocking to one's sense of fairness (see Matter of Short v. Nassau County Civ. Serv. Comm., 45 N.Y.2d 721, 408 N.Y.S.2d 471, 380 N.E.2d 298; Matter of Pell v. Board of Educ., 34 N.Y.2d 222, 356 N.Y.S.2d 833, 313 N.E.2d 321; Matter of Mann v. Town of Monroe, supra; Matter of Parker v. Blauvelt Volunteer Fire Co., supra).
The petitioner's remaining contentions are unpreserved for judicial review and, in any event, without merit.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: February 14, 2005
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)