Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Joanne STEPHENS, appellant, v. SUFFOLK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL SERVICE, et al., respondents.
In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Suffolk County Department of Civil Service, dated May 16, 2003, which disqualified the petitioner from eligibility for the position of police officer in the County of Suffolk, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Klein, J.), dated October 8, 2003, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
The petitioner applied for the position of police officer in the County of Suffolk. She provided a urine sample for drug screening in connection with her qualification tests for appointment. She tested positive for barbiturates, a controlled substance. The petitioner was disqualified from eligibility for the position by the Suffolk County Department of Civil Service. She commenced this proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review the determination disqualifying her from eligibility. The Supreme Court denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding. We affirm.
The Suffolk County Department of Civil Service is afforded wide discretion in determining the fitness of candidates for appointment. “ Such discretion is particularly necessary in hiring police officers, to whom higher standards of fitness and character may be applied” (Matter of Havern v. Senko, 210 A.D.2d 480, 481, 620 N.Y.S.2d 470). As long as the administrative determination is not irrational or arbitrary, this court will not interfere with it (see Matter of Verme v. Suffolk County Dept. of Civ. Serv., 5 A.D.3d 498, 773 N.Y.S.2d 106; Matter of Havern v. Senko, supra ). The petitioner's failure to pass the qualifying medical examination supports the determination of the Suffolk County Department of Civil Service (see Matter of Verme v. Suffolk County Dept. of Civ. Serv., supra, at 499, 773 N.Y.S.2d 106; Matter of Ressa v. County of Nassau, 224 A.D.2d 534, 638 N.Y.S.2d 158).
The petitioner's claim that the respondents violated her right of appeal under the Suffolk County Department of Civil Service Rules is without merit.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: February 22, 2005
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)