Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Joseph S. GONCALVES Jr., Petitioner, v. James C. BERBARY, as Superintendent of Collins Correctional Facility, et al., Respondents.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner challenges a determination finding him guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules that prohibit violent conduct, harassment and making threats. The misbehavior report relates that when petitioner's request for additional toilet paper was denied by a correction officer who was passing out supplies, petitioner threatened the correction officer and a bar of soap was thrown from the cell, hitting the correction officer in the leg. In addition to the misbehavior report, a videotape of the incident, although not conclusive, corroborates part of the misbehavior report. Although petitioner maintains that it was his cellmate who was involved in the incident, petitioner's testimony and that of his cellmate establish that petitioner was in fact involved in an exchange with the correction officer. Contrary to petitioner's contention, the misbehavior report, videotape and testimony at the hearing provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt (see Matter of Porter v. Goord, 7 A.D.3d 847, 776 N.Y.S.2d 355 [2004] ). Testimony at the hearing contradicting the events as set forth in the misbehavior report created a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see Matter of Nimmons v. Goord, 7 A.D.3d 887, 776 N.Y.S.2d 629 [2004] ). We are also unpersuaded by petitioner's contention of hearing officer bias inasmuch as a review of the record establishes that the outcome of the hearing flowed from the evidence adduced at the hearing and not from any alleged bias on the part of the Hearing Officer (see Matter of Brown v. Selsky, 5 A.D.3d 905, 906-907, 772 N.Y.S.2d 757 [2004] ).
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: January 06, 2005
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)