Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Rhagi EL, Petitioner, v. Donald SELSKY, as Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs, et al., Respondents.
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.
Petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with using a controlled substance after his urine twice tested positive for the presence of cannabinoids. He was found guilty of this charge following a tier III disciplinary hearing. The determination of guilt was upheld on administrative appeal, but the penalty was modified. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.
We confirm. The misbehavior report, together with the positive urinalysis test results, supporting documentation and testimony of the correction officers who administered the tests, provide substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt (see Matter of McCorkle v. Bennett, 8 A.D.3d 918, 919, 779 N.Y.S.2d 623 [2004]; Matter of Sanchez v. Selsky, 8 A.D.3d 846, 846, 778 N.Y.S.2d 561 [2004] ). Petitioner's claim that the chain of custody was broken is without merit. The officers who tested the urine specimen testified that the sample remained in their possession when it was not secured in the freezer and the request for urinalysis form set forth the specific times the sample was handled and by whom, thereby establishing that the appropriate testing procedures were followed (see Matter of Velez v. Selsky, 6 A.D.3d 783 [2004]; Matter of Victor v. Goord, 309 A.D.2d 1026, 1026, 766 N.Y.S.2d 138 [2003] ). Petitioner's remaining contentions are either unpreserved for our review or meritless (see Matter of Presley v. Miller, 306 A.D.2d 707, 707, 760 N.Y.S.2d 692 [2003]; Matter of Valentine v. Coughlin, 200 A.D.2d 838, 838, 606 N.Y.S.2d 800 [1994] ).
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: January 06, 2005
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)