Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Peter BENENFELD, deceased. Frank P. Marino, respondent; Abraham Kleinman, et al., appellants.
In a proceeding to compel payment of a legal fee, Abraham Kleinman and Joseph Pokart appeal from a decree of the Surrogate's Court, Rockland County (Weiner, S.), dated March 26, 2004, which, after a hearing, granted the petition and directed them to pay the sum of $87,800 to the petitioner's attorney out of estate funds.
ORDERED that the decree is affirmed, with costs payable by the estate.
Contrary to the appellants' contention, the record amply supported the findings of the Surrogate's Court that attorney Frank P. Marino represented one of the executors of the estate and the interests of the estate itself at all relevant times and, in any event, that the subject legal services performed by Marino substantially benefitted the estate (see generally Matter of Driscoll, 273 A.D.2d 381, 709 N.Y.S.2d 597; Matter of Graham, 238 A.D.2d 682, 656 N.Y.S.2d 434; Matter of Kinzler, 195 A.D.2d 464, 600 N.Y.S.2d 126). Accordingly, the Surrogate's Court providently exercised its discretion in directing the appellants to pay Marino's fee out of estate funds (see e.g. Cooper v. Jones, 78 A.D.2d 423, 435 N.Y.S.2d 830). Additionally, given Marino's experience, the size of the estate, the nature of the problems confronted, and the results achieved, the Surrogate's Court properly determined that the fee was reasonable and appropriate (see generally Matter of Freeman, 34 N.Y.2d 1, 355 N.Y.S.2d 336, 311 N.E.2d 480; Matter of Pekofsky v. Estate of Cohen, 259 A.D.2d 702, 686 N.Y.S.2d 837).
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: March 14, 2005
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)